I have a list of checksums, can you cross-reference these to see if there are any matches on your end?
Checksum Hashes
0f07493ab68f6eea6a2b765bd1f28508
d4867ca2cd7c1e05a6552aa4ae968d93
e73d531e6ca3c6df41555e3bc249576e
caecc72002bbb2d496a2108afaf0d3c3
e3e0b29fd45f838643e7fb689f08c57f
e3e0b29fd45f838643e7fb689f08c57f
b904f8f47e33a74cbe6a747e6dd3eb43
6c0bc8cf02f5214c6cc4257c940ce85c
6c0bc8cf02f5214c6cc4257c940ce85c
594b73c2d5e32f48b5464927dfa9a76b
Also is there any form of fingerprinting being utilized which would result in a file modification hence changing the checksum hash whenever a user is to download from the site?
I have a list of checksums, can you cross-reference these to see if there are any matches on your end?
Checksum Hashes
0f07493ab68f6eea6a2b765bd1f28508
d4867ca2cd7c1e05a6552aa4ae968d93
e73d531e6ca3c6df41555e3bc249576e
caecc72002bbb2d496a2108afaf0d3c3
e3e0b29fd45f838643e7fb689f08c57f
e3e0b29fd45f838643e7fb689f08c57f
b904f8f47e33a74cbe6a747e6dd3eb43
6c0bc8cf02f5214c6cc4257c940ce85c
6c0bc8cf02f5214c6cc4257c940ce85c
594b73c2d5e32f48b5464927dfa9a76b
Also is there any form of fingerprinting being utilized which would result in a file modification hence changing the checksum hash whenever a user is to download from the site?
Oh yup. you're correct about the fingerprinting. If its easier, I can just give you a plan on the site and you can download the files and see that its not a bunch of empty lines. There were a couple of dupe files, which I removed
I have a list of checksums, can you cross-reference these to see if there are any matches on your end?
Checksum Hashes
0f07493ab68f6eea6a2b765bd1f28508
d4867ca2cd7c1e05a6552aa4ae968d93
e73d531e6ca3c6df41555e3bc249576e
caecc72002bbb2d496a2108afaf0d3c3
e3e0b29fd45f838643e7fb689f08c57f
e3e0b29fd45f838643e7fb689f08c57f
b904f8f47e33a74cbe6a747e6dd3eb43
6c0bc8cf02f5214c6cc4257c940ce85c
6c0bc8cf02f5214c6cc4257c940ce85c
594b73c2d5e32f48b5464927dfa9a76b
Also is there any form of fingerprinting being utilized which would result in a file modification hence changing the checksum hash whenever a user is to download from the site?
Oh yup. you're correct about the fingerprinting. If its easier, I can just give you a plan on the site and you can download the files and see that its not a bunch of empty lines. There were a couple of dupe files, which I removed
Yeah, the duplication can be seen through our checksum hashes, as well as the fingerprinting.
If you review the lists there are 2 sets of duplicate files that prove the fingerprinting since they appear to be indexed at the same position(s). [ (5 & 6), (8 & 9) ]
I have a list of checksums, can you cross-reference these to see if there are any matches on your end?
Checksum Hashes
0f07493ab68f6eea6a2b765bd1f28508
d4867ca2cd7c1e05a6552aa4ae968d93
e73d531e6ca3c6df41555e3bc249576e
caecc72002bbb2d496a2108afaf0d3c3
e3e0b29fd45f838643e7fb689f08c57f
e3e0b29fd45f838643e7fb689f08c57f
b904f8f47e33a74cbe6a747e6dd3eb43
6c0bc8cf02f5214c6cc4257c940ce85c
6c0bc8cf02f5214c6cc4257c940ce85c
594b73c2d5e32f48b5464927dfa9a76b
Also is there any form of fingerprinting being utilized which would result in a file modification hence changing the checksum hash whenever a user is to download from the site?
Oh yup. you're correct about the fingerprinting. If its easier, I can just give you a plan on the site and you can download the files and see that its not a bunch of empty lines. There were a couple of dupe files, which I removed
Yeah, the duplication can be seen through our checksum hashes, as well as the fingerprinting.
If you review the lists there are 2 sets of duplicate files that prove the fingerprinting since they appear to be indexed at the same position(s). [ (5 & 6), (8 & 9) ]