false claim. if u dont use claude code cli or codex cli, the model will be fall to not mapped one (in this case using curl and 3rd party ai chat) that detected from your request origin. i ve already providing three channels that user can choose n use
this kid debating that our light and high endpoint re getting error. its expected cz u using it outside the designed one. am not designing to use it to your personal usage. thats why in faq its already explained https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/im...mh43HGLFNz
this kid (cant even read rofl rofl) also wanna use our api to outside the recommendation one. like this kid know how my apps work lmao. dangg am here as the creator lol, while ive explain already. everything already explained in FAQ.
everything is working through our three available channels
false claim. if u dont use claude code cli or codex cli, the model will be fall to not mapped one (in this case using curl and 3rd party ai chat) that detected from your request origin. i ve already providing three channels that user can choose n use
this kid debating that our light and high endpoint re getting error. its expected cz u using it outside the designed one. am not designing to use it to your personal usage. thats why in faq its already explained https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/im...mh43HGLFNz
this kid (cant even read rofl rofl) also wanna use our api to outside the recommendation one. like this kid know how my apps work lmao. dangg am here as the creator lol, while ive explain already. everything already explained in FAQ.
everything is working through our three available channels
I don't know who you're calling a kid, but the way you type is giving me brain damage
You advertised your product as "Claude Opus 4.6 API access." Anyone with common sense knows an API is a universal protocol, so it doesn't matter if I use your "recommended" CLI, a Python script, or a raw curl command. The JSON payload hitting your server is exactly the same. If you don't expliticly say that it's locked to certain software like CLI or whatever third party tool you FAQ has, then it's false advertising. Even that is not the point here, it's the scummy behavior of you denying that you're routing it through a cheaper model, only saying that it works with your CLI bullshit which it doesn't matter. You would be literally false advertising and routing through cheaper models, that's 2 separate issues here.
Afterall, your API did work on your normal domain endpoint "claude-sudo.party" and on "claude-light.sudo.party" thus it means that your API did work with my chainlit tool, it is the same way with how you use with CLI on a different way communicating with it. After sending basic curl commands, the headers being sent was claude-opus-4.6 which I did receive a proper API response for, the point is that all prompts are being routed to 3.5 sonnet.
Even if you say that it only works with CLI that it will show opus 4.6. If it was like that then CURL wouldn't work and my tool communicating with your API wouldn't work. ( https://prnt.sc/ayZHmZYRd-m7 )
If your server actually "fell back to an unmapped model" like you claim, the json response wouldn't literally say "model: claude-opus-4-6" while the AI text inside admits it's a 2024 claude 3.5 brain. Thus you can spoof the models very easily, you're just running a proxy that takes the opus name so the software doesn't know but routes the actual prompt to a cheap sonnet backend. It just proves you're running a proxy that spoofs the Opus name ( https://prnt.sc/g8Fu_vxC092a )
You can literally test out with a basic CURL command, send same proper headers changing the model name to anything else than "model: claude-opus-4-6" and it will give an error, this proves that when sending with the opus 4.6 model you are spoofing the model routing to a claude 3.5 sonnet whenever I ask which model it is. ( https://prnt.sc/nsdfOUUO_yTe )
This is all literal common sense, you can't just advertise it as API access while it is "locked" to your CLI tools, and mentioning it works with third party tools, only to see that it doesn't even route prompts properly, you're on some bullshit that's for sure
false claim. if u dont use claude code cli or codex cli, the model will be fall to not mapped one (in this case using curl and 3rd party ai chat) that detected from your request origin. i ve already providing three channels that user can choose n use
this kid debating that our light and high endpoint re getting error. its expected cz u using it outside the designed one. am not designing to use it to your personal usage. thats why in faq its already explained https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/im...mh43HGLFNz
this kid (cant even read rofl rofl) also wanna use our api to outside the recommendation one. like this kid know how my apps work lmao. dangg am here as the creator lol, while ive explain already. everything already explained in FAQ.
everything is working through our three available channels
I don't know who you're calling a kid, but the way you type is giving me a brain damage
You advertised your product as "Claude Opus 4.6 API access." Anyone with common sense knows an API is a universal protocol, so it doesn't matter if I use your "recommended" CLI, a Python script, or a raw curl command. The JSON payload hitting your server is exactly the same. If you don't expliticly say that it's locked to certain software like CLI or whatever third party tool you FAQ has, then it's false advertising. Even that is not the point here, it's the scummy behavior of you denying that you're routing it through a cheaper model, only saying that it works with your CLI bullshit which it doesn't matter. You would be literally false advertising and routing through cheaper models, that's 2 separate issues here.
Afterall, your API did work on your normal domain endpoint "claude-sudo.party" and on "claude-light.sudo.party" thus it means that your API did work with my chainlit tool, it is the same way with how you use with CLI on a different way communicating with it. After sending basic curl commands, the headers being sent was claude-opus-4.6 which I did receive a proper API response for, the point is that all prompts are being routed to 3.5 sonnet.
Even if you say that it only works with CLI that it will show opus 4.6. If it was like that then CURL wouldn't work and my tool communicating with your API wouldn't work. ( https://prnt.sc/ayZHmZYRd-m7 )
If your server actually "fell back to an unmapped model" like you claim, the json response wouldn't literally say "model: claude-opus-4-6" while the AI text inside admits it's a 2024 claude 3.5 brain. Thus you can spoof the models very easily, you're just running a proxy that takes the opus name so the software doesn't know but routes the actual prompt to a cheap sonnet backend. It just proves you're running a proxy that spoofs the Opus name ( https://prnt.sc/g8Fu_vxC092a )
You can literally test out with a basic CURL command, send same proper headers changing the model name to anything else than "model: claude-opus-4-6" and it will give an error, this proves that when sending with the opus 4.6 model you are spoofing the model routing to a claude 3.5 sonnet whenever I ask which model it is. ( https://prnt.sc/nsdfOUUO_yTe )
This is all literal common sense, you can't just advertise it as API access while it is "locked" to your CLI tools, and mentioning it works with third party tools, only to see that it doesn't even route prompts properly, you're on some bullshit that's for sure
u just repeating the question that already answered
read carefully the FAQ next time before purchasing product
This post is by a banned member (BlastVPS) - Unhide
OP16 March, 2026 - 12:41 AM(This post was last modified: 16 March, 2026 - 12:46 AM by BlastVPS. Edited 5 times in total.)
Reply
(16 March, 2026 - 12:25 AM)vaniria Wrote: Show More
(15 March, 2026 - 11:29 PM)BlastVPS Wrote: Show More
(15 March, 2026 - 10:55 PM)vaniria Wrote: Show More
hi, thanks for tagging me
false claim. if u dont use claude code cli or codex cli, the model will be fall to not mapped one (in this case using curl and 3rd party ai chat) that detected from your request origin. i ve already providing three channels that user can choose n use
this kid debating that our light and high endpoint re getting error. its expected cz u using it outside the designed one. am not designing to use it to your personal usage. thats why in faq its already explained https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/im...mh43HGLFNz
this kid (cant even read rofl rofl) also wanna use our api to outside the recommendation one. like this kid know how my apps work lmao. dangg am here as the creator lol, while ive explain already. everything already explained in FAQ.
everything is working through our three available channels
I don't know who you're calling a kid, but the way you type is giving me a brain damage
You advertised your product as "Claude Opus 4.6 API access." Anyone with common sense knows an API is a universal protocol, so it doesn't matter if I use your "recommended" CLI, a Python script, or a raw curl command. The JSON payload hitting your server is exactly the same. If you don't expliticly say that it's locked to certain software like CLI or whatever third party tool you FAQ has, then it's false advertising. Even that is not the point here, it's the scummy behavior of you denying that you're routing it through a cheaper model, only saying that it works with your CLI bullshit which it doesn't matter. You would be literally false advertising and routing through cheaper models, that's 2 separate issues here.
Afterall, your API did work on your normal domain endpoint "claude-sudo.party" and on "claude-light.sudo.party" thus it means that your API did work with my chainlit tool, it is the same way with how you use with CLI on a different way communicating with it. After sending basic curl commands, the headers being sent was claude-opus-4.6 which I did receive a proper API response for, the point is that all prompts are being routed to 3.5 sonnet.
Even if you say that it only works with CLI that it will show opus 4.6. If it was like that then CURL wouldn't work and my tool communicating with your API wouldn't work. ( https://prnt.sc/ayZHmZYRd-m7 )
If your server actually "fell back to an unmapped model" like you claim, the json response wouldn't literally say "model: claude-opus-4-6" while the AI text inside admits it's a 2024 claude 3.5 brain. Thus you can spoof the models very easily, you're just running a proxy that takes the opus name so the software doesn't know but routes the actual prompt to a cheap sonnet backend. It just proves you're running a proxy that spoofs the Opus name ( https://prnt.sc/g8Fu_vxC092a )
You can literally test out with a basic CURL command, send same proper headers changing the model name to anything else than "model: claude-opus-4-6" and it will give an error, this proves that when sending with the opus 4.6 model you are spoofing the model routing to a claude 3.5 sonnet whenever I ask which model it is. ( https://prnt.sc/nsdfOUUO_yTe )
This is all literal common sense, you can't just advertise it as API access while it is "locked" to your CLI tools, and mentioning it works with third party tools, only to see that it doesn't even route prompts properly, you're on some bullshit that's for sure
u just repeating the question that already answered
read carefully the FAQ next time before purchasing product
What does your low-iq FAQ say? It literally says "Can I use it in IDEs or third-party tools?" It says "Yes! Fully compatible with Claude Code CLI, Codex CLI, VS Code extension, VS Code forks (Cursor, Windsurf, etc.), and JetBrains IDEs (PyCharm, WebStorm, GoLand)." Where do you expliticly say that you can't use it with any other third party tools? It's not my fault that you can't properly advertise your product, again it's not the point here. it's your scummy scheme here to route through a cheaper model lol. Afterall looking at your profile, thread replies, you're just an alt account farming on such schemes which is sad already
I received a DM few moments ago from somebody else that tested it on CLI, and proof is below where on the right is official Claude opus 4.6 and on the left your pre-pasted identity preventing it from showing what the model really is. https://prnt.sc/LJQhd52PpX1e https://prnt.sc/ClhFL-cW38te
(16 March, 2026 - 12:41 AM)BlastVPS Wrote: Show More
(16 March, 2026 - 12:25 AM)vaniria Wrote: Show More
(15 March, 2026 - 11:29 PM)BlastVPS Wrote: Show More
I don't know who you're calling a kid, but the way you type is giving me a brain damage
You advertised your product as "Claude Opus 4.6 API access." Anyone with common sense knows an API is a universal protocol, so it doesn't matter if I use your "recommended" CLI, a Python script, or a raw curl command. The JSON payload hitting your server is exactly the same. If you don't expliticly say that it's locked to certain software like CLI or whatever third party tool you FAQ has, then it's false advertising. Even that is not the point here, it's the scummy behavior of you denying that you're routing it through a cheaper model, only saying that it works with your CLI bullshit which it doesn't matter. You would be literally false advertising and routing through cheaper models, that's 2 separate issues here.
Afterall, your API did work on your normal domain endpoint "claude-sudo.party" and on "claude-light.sudo.party" thus it means that your API did work with my chainlit tool, it is the same way with how you use with CLI on a different way communicating with it. After sending basic curl commands, the headers being sent was claude-opus-4.6 which I did receive a proper API response for, the point is that all prompts are being routed to 3.5 sonnet.
Even if you say that it only works with CLI that it will show opus 4.6. If it was like that then CURL wouldn't work and my tool communicating with your API wouldn't work. ( https://prnt.sc/ayZHmZYRd-m7 )
If your server actually "fell back to an unmapped model" like you claim, the json response wouldn't literally say "model: claude-opus-4-6" while the AI text inside admits it's a 2024 claude 3.5 brain. Thus you can spoof the models very easily, you're just running a proxy that takes the opus name so the software doesn't know but routes the actual prompt to a cheap sonnet backend. It just proves you're running a proxy that spoofs the Opus name ( https://prnt.sc/g8Fu_vxC092a )
You can literally test out with a basic CURL command, send same proper headers changing the model name to anything else than "model: claude-opus-4-6" and it will give an error, this proves that when sending with the opus 4.6 model you are spoofing the model routing to a claude 3.5 sonnet whenever I ask which model it is. ( https://prnt.sc/nsdfOUUO_yTe )
This is all literal common sense, you can't just advertise it as API access while it is "locked" to your CLI tools, and mentioning it works with third party tools, only to see that it doesn't even route prompts properly, you're on some bullshit that's for sure
u just repeating the question that already answered
read carefully the FAQ next time before purchasing product
What does your low-iq FAQ say? It literally says "Can I use it in IDEs or third-party tools?" It says "Yes! Fully compatible with Claude Code CLI, Codex CLI, VS Code extension, VS Code forks (Cursor, Windsurf, etc.), and JetBrains IDEs (PyCharm, WebStorm, GoLand)." Where do you expliticly say that you can't use it with any other third party tools? It's not my fault that you can't properly advertise your product, again it's not the point here. it's your scummy scheme here to route through a cheaper model lol. Afterall looking at your profile, thread replies, you're just an alt account farming on such schemes which is sad already
I received a DM few moments ago from somebody else that tested it on CLI, and proof is below where on the right is official Claude opus 4.6 and on the left your pre-pasted identity preventing it from showing what the model really is. https://prnt.sc/LJQhd52PpX1e https://prnt.sc/ClhFL-cW38te
You got caught in your own act absolute dumbass
what re u explaining rn is mean nothing kid, learn how to read FAQ n always ask if u v question
same question repeated multiple time lol, since your first chat on telegram until now rofl
what i can say is, if u ve question make sure its asked to seller, always confirm
u bought this in a rush, didn't bother learning how to use it, ignored all my recommendations, and now you're acting like an expert on my system. stop being a know-it-all and actually follow the instructions
your last img also not representing the high endpoint lol, agan this is my last i repeat this, i ve multichannel that user can choose
This post is by a banned member (BlastVPS) - Unhide
(16 March, 2026 - 05:54 AM)vaniria Wrote: Show More
(16 March, 2026 - 12:41 AM)BlastVPS Wrote: Show More
(16 March, 2026 - 12:25 AM)vaniria Wrote: Show More
u just repeating the question that already answered
read carefully the FAQ next time before purchasing product
What does your low-iq FAQ say? It literally says "Can I use it in IDEs or third-party tools?" It says "Yes! Fully compatible with Claude Code CLI, Codex CLI, VS Code extension, VS Code forks (Cursor, Windsurf, etc.), and JetBrains IDEs (PyCharm, WebStorm, GoLand)." Where do you expliticly say that you can't use it with any other third party tools? It's not my fault that you can't properly advertise your product, again it's not the point here. it's your scummy scheme here to route through a cheaper model lol. Afterall looking at your profile, thread replies, you're just an alt account farming on such schemes which is sad already
I received a DM few moments ago from somebody else that tested it on CLI, and proof is below where on the right is official Claude opus 4.6 and on the left your pre-pasted identity preventing it from showing what the model really is. https://prnt.sc/LJQhd52PpX1e https://prnt.sc/ClhFL-cW38te
You got caught in your own act absolute dumbass
what re u explaining rn is mean nothing kid, learn how to read FAQ n always ask if u v question
same question repeated multiple time lol, since your first chat on telegram until now rofl
what i can say is, if u ve question make sure its asked to seller, always confirm
u bought this in a rush, didn't bother learning how to use it, ignored all my recommendations, and now you're acting like an expert on my system. stop being a know-it-all and actually follow the instructions
your last img also not representing the high endpoint lol, agan this is my last i repeat this, i ve multichannel that user can choose
You just don't comprehend what we're even talking about are you braindead?
There's no "what i can say" advertise your product properly and stop routing through cheaper models to make $
Even your own token checker shows https://prnt.sc/bkrp6mxQZK_L that only opus 4.6 was used? Lol how much more clearer does it need to be?
Those multichannels don't even make sense in the first place, you advertise as 4.6 opus and are expected to receive 4.6 opus, not to figure out yourself that it's a cheaper model and then ask just to receive "other channels" to connect with which didn't properly work either
Actually I did thoroughly followed your thread, your faq and it was too good to be true, that's why i started investigating, regarding your CLI bullshit it's something that doesn't get through your brain that APIs don't work that way, and EVEN then, you are false advertising by not mentioning explitcily that it's for CLI
