Supreme Scam Report @0xtxn

[61]

Scammers Profile Link: Cracked.ax - Profile of 0xtxn
Sales Thread: NEXUS METHODS: 2 Dead Simple Unique Methods Making $1.2K–$2K/Month in 2026 (BLACKHAT) | Cracked.ax
Amount or Item(s) Scammed:130$ (BTC)
Screenshots of Communication: https://imagur.org/i/IGfvkEd3
Additional Information:This user took $130 from me for this package. The main problem is that, based on what he says in the screenshot I uploaded, it looks like it does not need a lot of money, but in the package he says you must buy proxies and combos because the free ones are useless. Also, to use some tools, he says you need to buy the NOVA rank (Patched), plus there are other costs too. If the admin wants, I can send the full package so they can check it themselves.
The second problem is that the methods he mentioned are not new. They already existed before, so there is no reason for me to pay him $130 for them. If needed, I can write the names of the targets here so you can just search them in the search bar and see that these targets have already been shared before. But he claims that these methods were created by himself, while it is completely clear that they were already leaked, and now he wants to make money from them.
Crypto address for a refund:
bc1qg9aq6xyxg48he6lsq3kaaqshf9ad468pkfwl2w

[0]

System bot message: @0xtxn (0xtxn) has been notified about this dispute via private messages and has 24hours to reply in this thread

 

Taking care of cracked.sh's leechers. Every day.
If you have a question regarding your leeching level, click here.

[61]

Scammers Profile Link: Cracked.ax - Profile of 0xtxn
Sales Thread: NEXUS METHODS: 2 Dead Simple Unique Methods Making $1.2K–$2K/Month in 2026 (BLACKHAT) | Cracked.ax
Amount or Item(s) Scammed:130$ (BTC)
Screenshots of Communication: https://imagur.org/i/IGfvkEd3
Additional Information:This user took $130 from me for this package. The main problem is that, based on what he says in the screenshot I uploaded, it looks like it does not need a lot of money, but in the package he says you must buy proxies and combos because the free ones are useless. Also, to use some tools, he says you need to buy the NOVA rank (Patched), plus there are other costs too. If the admin wants, I can send the full package so they can check it themselves.
The second problem is that the methods he mentioned are not new. They already existed before, so there is no reason for me to pay him $130 for them. If needed, I can write the names of the targets here so you can just search them in the search bar and see that these targets have already been shared before. But he claims that these methods were created by himself, while it is completely clear that they were already leaked, and now he wants to make money from them.
Crypto address for a refund:
bc1qg9aq6xyxg48he6lsq3kaaqshf9ad468pkfwl2w

Additional screenshots:
https://imagur.org/i/WVz3ZxNY
https://imagur.org/i/kLDXA2Na
https://imagur.org/i/DnCdUipx
https://imagur.org/i/i4IvCbgl
 As I mentioned before, this whole package requires a lot of extra costs, which shows that it is not private at all. If needed, the names of the targets, which are completely public, along with the methods, can be sent to the admins.

[31]

The buyer opened the scam report in less than 12 hours after receiving the files. That is way too early to call any cashout or account opening method "not working", especially when the methods I sell have multiple steps that take 24-48 hours minimum to show results.
Here are the facts:

• He has provided zero proof that he actually followed the method (no logs, no screenshots of any attempts, no error messages, nothing).
  
• He is publicly leaking parts of the method in the scam report itself. This is against the rules and shows bad faith.
  
• My methods do involve upfront costs (drops, SIMs, residential proxies, aged accounts, etc.). In the description and in the thread I have always been transparent, I never mentioned that this is a zero-cost method.
  
• He never contacted me before opening the report. He never asked how much money is needed to run it, never asked for help when he got stuck. He went straight to a scam report.
  

This is a classic case of buyer’s remorse + trying to get a refund after already receiving the full method (and partially leaking it).
I am willing to help any serious buyer who actually puts in the work and follows the steps. If he had messaged me with specific errors or proof of what he tried, I would have guided him. Instead he chose to damage my reputation with no evidence.

Moderator note: Please check the timing of the report (only 12 hours after purchase), the lack of any proof on his side, and the fact that he is leaking the method in the report. This should be rejected as a invalid scam report.

https://t.me/zeroxtxn

[61]

The buyer opened the scam report in less than 12 hours after receiving the files. That is way too early to call any cashout or account opening method "not working", especially when the methods I sell have multiple steps that take 24-48 hours minimum to show results.
Here are the facts:

• He has provided zero proof that he actually followed the method (no logs, no screenshots of any attempts, no error messages, nothing).
  
• He is publicly leaking parts of the method in the scam report itself. This is against the rules and shows bad faith.
  
• My methods do involve upfront costs (drops, SIMs, residential proxies, aged accounts, etc.). In the description and in the thread I have always been transparent, I never mentioned that this is a zero-cost method.
  
• He never contacted me before opening the report. He never asked how much money is needed to run it, never asked for help when he got stuck. He went straight to a scam report.
  

This is a classic case of buyer’s remorse + trying to get a refund after already receiving the full method (and partially leaking it).
I am willing to help any serious buyer who actually puts in the work and follows the steps. If he had messaged me with specific errors or proof of what he tried, I would have guided him. Instead he chose to damage my reputation with no evidence.

Moderator note: Please check the timing of the report (only 12 hours after purchase), the lack of any proof on his side, and the fact that he is leaking the method in the report. This should be rejected as a invalid scam report.

Thank you for replying. Let me answer your points one by one.
First, as I said before, more screenshots and more explanations will be sent later to the admins to prove that this package is public and does not contain any private method. If I did not send everything at first, it was only to avoid spoiling your package and because of cracked forum rules.
Second, I did not make any method from the package public, so please do not confuse the admins for no reason. Even the part that showed the username was censored by me, and the rest only shows the extra costs.
Third, I fully understand that every method has a cost. But the costs you mentioned would make sense for a private package with private methods, not for something that is already public and already being used by many people. Also, the costs you mentioned are very basic and useless. You could have provided those tools for free instead of putting a patched upgrade link inside the package.
Fourth, did I ever talk to you before opening the scam report? Good, because we can upload screenshots here as well.
And finally, what you are saying has nothing to do with the main issue. Whether it took 12 hours or 1 hour does not matter. A public package with many extra costs is enough reason for me to open a scam report. I have been on Cracked for about 5 or 6 years and I do not even have one scam report, so please try to be respectful here.

---

The buyer opened the scam report in less than 12 hours after receiving the files. That is way too early to call any cashout or account opening method "not working", especially when the methods I sell have multiple steps that take 24-48 hours minimum to show results.
Here are the facts:

• He has provided zero proof that he actually followed the method (no logs, no screenshots of any attempts, no error messages, nothing).
  
• He is publicly leaking parts of the method in the scam report itself. This is against the rules and shows bad faith.
  
• My methods do involve upfront costs (drops, SIMs, residential proxies, aged accounts, etc.). In the description and in the thread I have always been transparent, I never mentioned that this is a zero-cost method.
  
• He never contacted me before opening the report. He never asked how much money is needed to run it, never asked for help when he got stuck. He went straight to a scam report.
  

This is a classic case of buyer’s remorse + trying to get a refund after already receiving the full method (and partially leaking it).
I am willing to help any serious buyer who actually puts in the work and follows the steps. If he had messaged me with specific errors or proof of what he tried, I would have guided him. Instead he chose to damage my reputation with no evidence.

Moderator note: Please check the timing of the report (only 12 hours after purchase), the lack of any proof on his side, and the fact that he is leaking the method in the report. This should be rejected as a invalid scam report.

Thank you for replying. Let me answer your points one by one.
First, as I said before, more screenshots and more explanations will be sent later to the admins to prove that this package is public and does not contain any private method. If I did not send everything at first, it was only to avoid spoiling your package and because of cracked forum rules.
Second, I did not make any method from the package public, so please do not confuse the admins for no reason. Even the part that showed the username was censored by me, and the rest only shows the extra costs.
Third, I fully understand that every method has a cost. But the costs you mentioned would make sense for a private package with private methods, not for something that is already public and already being used by many people. Also, the costs you mentioned are very basic and useless. You could have provided those tools for free instead of putting a patched upgrade link inside the package.
Fourth, did I ever talk to you before opening the scam report? Good, because we can upload screenshots here as well.
And finally, what you are saying has nothing to do with the main issue. Whether it took 12 hours or 1 hour does not matter. A public package with many extra costs is enough reason for me to open a scam report. I have been on Cracked for about 5 or 6 years and I do not even have one scam report, so please try to be respectful here.

What is interesting is that inside the package you say that a residential proxy is required, but on Telegram you say that no proxy is needed and that the HMC tool is proxiless.
https://imagur.org/i/bmxhasny
We all know that in 2026, for a mail access checker and to get good hits, you need residential proxies and also private combos. If what you are saying really existed, then 99% of the users here would already be in a better position than me and you.What you are saying may have worked for this same public target 4 years ago, not now.

[31]

Let me address your points clearly and with proof.

1. You claim you will send more proof later. A valid scam report should contain proof before you open it, not after. You opened the report within 12 hours of purchase with almost zero proof. That alone should raise red flags.
   
2. You say you didn’t leak the method. Yet in your scam report you literally posted a screenshot from inside my package (the one you linked with Imgur). You revealed the name of the method, part of the workflow, and are now discussing HMC tool and residential proxy requirements. That is leaking. You even admitted you censored it “to avoid spoiling the package” — meaning you know you’re exposing paid content.
   
3. You claim the method is “public”. Then why did you buy it? If it’s truly public, show the exact public thread where this exact package with all these files is freely shared. I’ll wait.
   
4. About costs: Complaining now that the costs are “basic” after you received the files is ridiculous. You never asked me before buying what the real monthly cost would be.
   
5. The most important contradiction you just exposed yourself:
   

You wrote in your report that I say residential proxy is required in the package. Then you posted a screenshot from my Telegram saying the HMC tool is proxiless.

That is not a contradiction — it’s two different things. The mail access checker part needs residentials. The HMC tool for the main method is indeed proxiless. You are mixing two separate tools to create confusion.

This package was never sold as “zero cost, no proxy, works with public combos in 2026”. Anyone with real experience knows that good mail access + account opening in current year requires investment.

You bought a paid package, received it, then immediately opened a scam report in under 12 hours without even messaging me once. You are now leaking parts of it while claiming you’re not. This is not how a 5–6 year old member with “no scam reports” should behave.

I stand by my package. I am ready to defend it in front of admins with full proof.

https://t.me/zeroxtxn

[61]

Let me address your points clearly and with proof.

1. You claim you will send more proof later. A valid scam report should contain proof before you open it, not after. You opened the report within 12 hours of purchase with almost zero proof. That alone should raise red flags.
   
2. You say you didn’t leak the method. Yet in your scam report you literally posted a screenshot from inside my package (the one you linked with Imgur). You revealed the name of the method, part of the workflow, and are now discussing HMC tool and residential proxy requirements. That is leaking. You even admitted you censored it “to avoid spoiling the package” — meaning you know you’re exposing paid content.
   
3. You claim the method is “public”. Then why did you buy it? If it’s truly public, show the exact public thread where this exact package with all these files is freely shared. I’ll wait.
   
4. About costs: Complaining now that the costs are “basic” after you received the files is ridiculous. You never asked me before buying what the real monthly cost would be.
   
5. The most important contradiction you just exposed yourself:
   

You wrote in your report that I say residential proxy is required in the package. Then you posted a screenshot from my Telegram saying the HMC tool is proxiless.

That is not a contradiction — it’s two different things. The mail access checker part needs residentials. The HMC tool for the main method is indeed proxiless. You are mixing two separate tools to create confusion.

This package was never sold as “zero cost, no proxy, works with public combos in 2026”. Anyone with real experience knows that good mail access + account opening in current year requires investment.

You bought a paid package, received it, then immediately opened a scam report in under 12 hours without even messaging me once. You are now leaking parts of it while claiming you’re not. This is not how a 5–6 year old member with “no scam reports” should behave.

I stand by my package. I am ready to defend it in front of admins with full proof.

• Yes, a valid scam report should include all the evidence( I already sent many proofs from a public package). But because posting that evidence could break Cracked’s rules, I will provide it if the admins ask for it. Even though nothing would happen if I posted it since the package is public, I am speaking from the point of view of following Cracked’s rules.
  
• The things I showed from the package are the most public parts, for example where to buy proxies or how to upgrade a patched account. Everything else is also public, including HMC, which is already free and public on Cracked. If I did not mention the target name or other details, it was only because I was following Cracked’s rules.
  
• And how was I supposed to know it was public before buying it? What a ridiculous question.
  
• As I mentioned above, every private package has its own costs, but not something that is public and based on a target that everyone is already using. (not upgrade your patched account to download tool)
  
• Talking to you more than this is just a waste of my time. I will wait for the admins to respond.
  

[31]

You claim you’re “following Cracked rules” by not posting full proof… but you already posted screenshots from inside my paid package. You posted the Imgur link, you talked about HMC being proxiless, you mentioned the residential proxy requirement, and you’re discussing the upgrade process.

That is leaking. Stop hiding behind “I’m following the rules” when it’s convenient for you.

You say HMC is free and public — wrong. Whatever version you find in this forum is a cracked version and most likely not working, did you at least check? NO. And the full method, the configs, the targets I’m using right now, the exact workflow, and the combination of tools is not the same thing as just downloading HMC from Cracked. You know this.
 
You never asked me a single question about costs to run the method before buying. You never messaged me after receiving it. You waited12 hours and opened a scam report with almost zero proof, while now leaking parts of the package in public.
 
This is not a real scam report. This is buyer’s remorse mixed with an attempt to get a free method + damage my sales.
 
I have no problem going in front of the admins. I will gladly send them the full uncensored package, the sales thread, the date you purchased, and all the contradictions in your story.
 
I’m done wasting time here too. Let the admins decide.

https://t.me/zeroxtxn